Download Aesthetic transformations : taking Nietzsche at his word by Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm; Socrates.; Jovanovski, Thomas; PDF

By Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm; Socrates.; Jovanovski, Thomas; Socrates., Socrates; Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm

During this provocative paintings, Thomas Jovanovski provides a contrasting interpretation to the postmodernist and feminist interpreting of Nietzsche. As Jovanovski continues, Nietzsche’s written inspiration is in particular a sustained activity geared toward negating and superseding the (primarily) Socratic rules of Western ontology with a brand new desk of aesthetic ethics - ethics that originate from the Dionysian perception of Aeschylean tragedy. simply because the Platonic Socrates perceived a urgent want for, and succeeded in constructing, a brand new world-historical ethic and aesthetic course grounded in cause, technological know-how, and optimism, so does Nietzsche regard the rebirth of an outdated tragic mythos because the automobile towards a cultural, political, and spiritual metamorphosis of the West. besides the fact that, Jovanovski contends that Nietzsche doesn't suggest the sort of radical social turning as an lead to itself, yet as basically the main consequential prerequisite to understanding the culminating item of his «historical philosophizing» - the exceptional visual appeal of the Übermensch

Show description

Read or Download Aesthetic transformations : taking Nietzsche at his word PDF

Best aesthetics books

Philosophy of the Film: Epistemology, Ontology, Aesthetics

Examines the overlap among movie and philosophy in 3 distinctive methods: epistemological matters in film-making and viewing; aesthetic conception and picture; and picture as a medium of philosophical expression.

Selected Writings on Aesthetics

A seminal determine within the philosophy of historical past, tradition, and language, Johann Gottfried Herder (1744-1803) additionally produced the most vital and unique works within the heritage of aesthetic concept. A scholar of Kant, he spent a lot of his lifestyles striving to reconcile the opposing poles of Enlightenment suggestion represented by means of his early mentors.

Word vs Image: Cognitive Hunger in Shakespeare’s England

Arguing on contemporary cognitive proof that analyzing a Bible is far tougher for human brains than seeing pictures, this booklet exposes the intensity and breadth of Protestant theologians' misunderstandings approximately how humans may reform their religious lives - how they can actually swap their minds.

Extra resources for Aesthetic transformations : taking Nietzsche at his word

Sample text

And it is plain . . that this is the purpose of the law, which is the ally of all classes in the state, and this is the aim of our control of children, our not leaving them free before we have established, so to speak, a constitutional government within them and, by fostering the best element in them with the aid of the like in ourselves, have set up in its place a similar guardian and ruler in the child, and then, and then only, we leave it free. (ibid. 590d-591a) Proof We new philosophers, .

But, as Nietzsche insists, “the fair frenzy of artistic enthusiasm had never glowed” in Socrates’ Cyclops eye: “To this eye was denied the pleasure of gazing into the Dionysian abysses” (ibid. 14). Is this a reflection of Nietzsche’s idea that when Euripides abandoned Dionysus, Apollo abandoned Euripides? In an important sense, yes, though, granted, the relationship of these individuals to Apollo is somewhat different. ” (ii) There is, I rather hasten to add here, hardly anything special or original in my observation that aesthetic Socratism quickly evolved into a viable current of its own and thus separated from, and put itself in determined opposition to, its Apollinian cradle.

Antithesis Humankind is nothing if not a material being, a body, which means that any and all supra-natural characteristics ascribed to it are merely (culturally) perverted attributes of the body. Proof When soul and body are both in the same place, nature teaches the one to serve and be subject, the other to rule and govern. . It is the nature of the divine to rule and direct, and that of the mortal to be subject and serve. . The soul is most like that which is divine, immortal, intelligible, uniform, indissoluble, and ever self-consistent and invariable, whereas body is most like that which is human, mortal, multiform, unintelligible, dissoluble, and never self-consistent .

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.00 of 5 – based on 44 votes